Аннотації

ЗАДАЧА ВИБОРУ ПАРТНЕРІВ ДЛЯ СПІВПРАЦІ В РАМКАХ НАУКОВИХ ПРОЕКТІВ

Автор(и):
Huilin Xu, Andrashko Yurii
Дата публікації:

05.02.2019

Анотація (укр):

В роботі наведено формальну постановку задачі пошуку партнерів для формування наукового консорціуму. Також визначено основні особливості партнерів (університетів, науково-дослідних інститутів, органів державної влади, приватних компаній, професійних асоціацій та фундацій), які впливають на способи комунікації та співпраці між ними. Сформовано перелік факторів, які впливають на створення партнерства науковців в рамках виконання проекту або гранту. Розглянуто основні методи оцінювання діяльності наукових установ та університетів в Україні та світі. Визначено, що для підбору наукових партнерів критерії відомих рейтингів не дають змогу сформувати раціональний ранжований перелік потенційних партнерів проекту, тому потребують доопрацювання.

Анотація (рус):

Анотація (англ):

The paper presents a formal statement of the problem of finding partners for the formation of a scientific consortium. The main features of partners (universities, research institutes, public authorities, private companies, professional associations and foundations), which influence the ways of communication and cooperation between them, are also defined. The list of factors influencing the creation of a partnership of scholars in the framework of a project or a grant is formed. The main methods of evaluating the activities of scientific institutions and universities in Ukraine and in the world are considered. It is determined that for the selection of scientific partners the criteria of known ratings do not allow to form a rational ranked list of potential partners of the project, therefore, they need to be finalized.

Література:

References:

  1. Biloshchytskyi, A., Kuchansky, A., Andrashko, Yu., Biloshchytska, S., Kuzka, O. & Terentyev, O. (2017). Evaluation methods of the results of scientific research activity of scientists based on the analysis of publication citations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3, 2 (87), 4–10, doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2017.103651
  2. Biloshchytskyi, A., Myronov, O., Reznik, R., Kuchansky, A., Andrashko, Yu., Paliy, S. et al. (2017). A method to evaluate the scientific activity quality of HEIs based on a scientometric subjects presentation model. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6, 2 (90), 16–22, doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2017.118377
  3. Biloshchytskyi, A., Kuchansky, A., Andrashko, Yu., Biloshchytska, S., Dubnytska, A. & Vatskel, V. (2017). The Method of the Scientific Directions Potential Forecasting in Infocommunication Systems of an Assessment of the Research Activity Results. 2017 IEEE International Conference «Problems of Infocommunications. Science and Technology» (PIC S&T), P. 69–72. doi: 10.1109/INFOCOMMST.2017.8246352
  4. Biloshchytskyi, А., Kuchansky, A., Andrashko, Yu., Biloshchytska, S. & Kuzka О. (2017). Conceptual model of information technology for evaluating the results of research work. Management of development of complex systems, 30, 163–168.
  5. Biloshchytskyi, A., Kuchansky, А., Andrashko, Yu., Paliy, S., Biloshchytska, S., Bronin, S. et al. (2018). Development of technical component of the methodology for project-vector management of educational environment. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/2 (92), 4–13.  doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2018.126301
  6. Kuchansky, А., Andrashko, Yu., Biloshchytskyi, А., Danchenko, O., Ilarionov, O., Vatskel, I. et al. (2018). The method for evaluation of educational environment subjects’ performance based on the calculation of volumes of m-simplexes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/4 (92), 15–25. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2018.126287
  7. Biloshchytskyi, A., Biloshchytska, S., Kuchansky, А., Bielova, O. & Andrashko, Yu. (2018). Infocommunication system of scientific activity management on the basis of project-vector methodology. 2018 14th International Conference on Advanced Trends in Radioelecrtronics, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering (TCSET), Lviv – Slavske, P. 200–203. doi: 10.1109/TCSET.2018.8336186
  8. Otradskaya, T., Gogunskii, V., Antoshchuk, S. & Kolesnikov, O. (2016). Development of parametric model of prediction and evaluation of the quality level of educational institutions. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5, 3 (83),. 12–21. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.80790].
  9. Morozov, V., Stechenko, G. & Kolomiiets, A. (2017). Learning Through Practice" in IT Management Projects Master Program Implementation Approach. 2017 9th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS): Bucharest, 2, P. 935–939.
  10. Morozov, V., Kalnichenko, O. & Liubyma, I. (2017). Projects change management in based on the projects configuration management for developing complex projects. 2017 9th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS): Bucharest, 2, P. 939–942.
  11. Kolesnіkov, О., Gogunskii, V., Kolesnіkova, K., Lukianov, D. & Olekh, T. (2016). Development of the model of interaction among the project, team of project and project environment in project system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(9(83)), 20–26. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.80769]
  12. Kolesnikova, K., Lukianov, D., Gogunskii, V., Iakovenko, V., Oborska, G., Negri, A. et al. (2017). Communication management in social networks for the actualization of publications in the world scientific community on the example of the network researchgate. Eastern-European Journal Of Enterprise Technologies, 4(3 (88)), 27–35. doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2017.108589]
  13. Teslia, I. & Latysheva, T. (2016). Development of conceptual frameworks of matrix management of project and programme portfolios. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(3 (79)), 12–18. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.61153]
  14. Fu, F., Hauert, C., Nowak, M.A. & Wang, L. (2008). Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks. Physical Review E 78, 026117.
  15. Wagner, C.S. & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34 (10), 1608–1618.
  16. Zhang, S. & Poulin, D. (1996). Partnership Management Within the Virtual Enterprise in a Network. International Conference on Engineering Management and Control, Р. 645-650.
  17. Talluri, S. & Baker, R.C. (1996). A quantitative Framework for Designing Efficient Business Process Alliances. International Conference on Engineering Management and Control, Р. 656-661.
  18. Chu, X.N., Tso, S.K., Zhang, W.J. & Li, Q. (2000). Partners Selection for Virtual Enterprises. Proceedings of the 3th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Р. 164-168.
  19. Feng, W.D., Chen, J. & Zhao, C.J. (2000). Partners Selection Process and Optimization Model for Virtual corporations Based on Genetic Algorithms. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 40, 120-124.
  20. Biloshchytskyi, A., Kuchansky, A., Andrashko, Yu., Biloshchytska, S., Kuzka, O., Shabala, Ye. et al. (2017). A method for the identification of scientists' research areas based on a cluster analysis of scientific publications. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5, 2 (89), 4–10. doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2017.112323]
  21. Holovenkin, V. (2008). Determination of ratings of scientific and pedagogical workers as a lever for achieving the criteria of a research university. Kiev Polytechnic, 31. Retrieved from: http://kpi.ua/831-5
  22. Bushuyev, S., Biloshchytskyi, A. & Gogunskyi, V. (2014). Science-based bases: characteristics, possibilities and tasks. Management of development of complex systems, 18, 145-152.